Hmm well probably not because he didnt do anything while he was in office, and he could have been replaced with a broken stapler and nobody would know the difference. All depends on who the republicans run against him. Also I find it funny how a liberal says a ham and cheese sandwich could beat Trump even though "the most qualified candidate ever" Hillary Clinton lost to him.
Sure, I get the desire to avoid corruption. But considering how absolutely none of the countless FBI claims the Republican's aimed at Clinton succeeded, she was likely one of the least corrupt politicians we've ever had anywhere close to the White House. Instead, we have a corrupt non-politician. Big whoop.