If NATO and BRICS went to war, which alliance would win?

Posted by: triangle.128k

  • NATO

  • BRICS

56% 18 votes
44% 14 votes
  • Well since most people who comment here do not have that much exprince let me be the voice of reason I am a lecturer at University of Cape Town and can I say I live in SA a brics country and the likely hood of a war is small and South Africa tries to be so neutral that we don't buy weapons from Russians and Americans we buy from The Seedes and Germans so SA being in war is slim and Brics needs NATO for trade and NATO needs Brics for raw materials a war between these two would ruin all their economies as it would be a war versus Technology (NATO) and manpower(25% of world population live in Bricks) so most likely a new world order would arise

  • You all are fucking idiots, BRICS would win. NATO stands zero chance.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
triangle.128k says2015-07-31T18:11:33.8077092Z
@MakeSensePeopleDont India and Brazil wouldn't be on the side of NATO, what are you talking about? They're a part of BRICS.
triangle.128k says2015-07-31T18:12:36.9895158Z
Considering that India, Russia and China have the best militaries in the world after USA, BRICS would probably win.
stargate says2015-07-31T18:22:32.4699484Z
Well I really doubt that India would attack us. If anything they would break that allance and help us. They do not see eye to eye with China. Also if we went to war it wouldn't just be us, a lot of nations would help Nato.
stargate says2015-07-31T18:23:07.3361719Z
Though we would all pretty much die from a war like that, due tp it most likely becoming WW3.
triangle.128k says2015-07-31T19:12:19.4146004Z
Well assuming war would break out and nobody joined either side, and that each country stayed loyal to their alliance group.
MakeSensePeopleDont says2015-08-01T02:58:32.6988234Z
@triangle.128k Gotta learn your global politics my friend. China and Iran only have military alliances with terrorist nations like Iran, Pakistan, and the new Iraq and Afghanistan. Brazil and India are on NATO side as combat against NATO nations would cause the destruction of their already feeble economies. Think about it, India is employed mostly by U.S. and it's partners in the West. How long do you think they would last if we officially called war against them? War means that no companies associated with the U.S. in any way can do business with that nation, otherwise their accounts and finances are immediately frozen in the global market and all stocks are tanked to no value...Not zero value....NO value. Companies won't risk this, which is why nobody does business with Iran.
MakeSensePeopleDont says2015-08-01T02:59:26.4411679Z
Correction; China, India, Brazil, Russia.
triangle.128k says2015-08-01T03:16:04.8163677Z
This is a hypothetical war, I know this would probably never happen.
MakeSensePeopleDont says2015-08-01T13:25:05.3096132Z
@triangle.128k Even hypothetical wars have to have basis in reality. Otherwise I could say something like "U.S. Unleashes the top secret black budget photon blaster orbiting the Earth for the past 10 years that nobody was aware of and fries India in under 60 seconds." or even better, "The alien species that have been working with the U.S. in secret for 70 years get angry and call for the defense forces circling our atmosphere to descend upon our enemies and annihilate them with super advanced phaser style weapons that nobody can defend against." See how ridiculous it gets without some kind of reality?
greatkitteh says2015-08-02T11:24:13.5483038Z
India and China have a Anti-terrorist alliance, so China wiuld Probably put it's back on pakistan. Also, Look at the Nukes.
58539672 says2015-08-04T06:38:57.9318344Z
BRICS is an economic alliance, not a military one. India, Brasil, and South Africa would have no incentive to assist Russia and China in a war. A better match-up would be NATO vs the SCO, since they are both actually military organizations.
PericIes says2015-08-04T07:38:52.4508198Z
@triangle.128k "Considering that India, Russia and China have the best militaries in the world after USA..." What are you talking about? India's military is a bunch of caste system peasants who are given guns and told which direction in which to walk. China has a large military that is slightly more technologically advanced than India's but they have no power projection at all. China's strength comes primarily from its numbers, which only come into play if the fighting takes place in China or close to it, and that certainly does not place China within the world's top four militaries. Russia and the U.S. are the only ones that you have placed accurately. Global firepower, which I suspect may be the font from which you derive your thick delusions, takes into account much more than military quality, and is not gospel anyway. I suggest that you educate yourself on the subject before making such claims.
greatkitteh says2015-08-11T11:43:31.0531404Z
@pericles Youbhave hotten toue sources ftom streotypes. Indian has 90-110 Nukes, Cyber Armies, And arguably the best sukois. India also isn't a "Peasent nation", BRICS doesn't invite "peasant nations". China also has more nukes than the UK, Hypersonic planes, And Intercontinetal Ballistic missiles, Which can it ANYWHERE In the USA. So, China can project power.
greatkitteh says2015-08-11T11:47:27.6910573Z
Also, Indiabtakes 70% ofbit's equipment from russia, Whilenisbthe secind biggest sharhokder in The BRICs bank, And won't turn it's back. Brazil has recently been the target of cyber attacks, And would have pressure from it's neighors. Argentina: Hates the UK over the flakland islands Venesula: Hates the USA Cuba: Host russia Urguray: Allies with BRICS.
MakeSensePeopleDont says2015-08-11T16:42:47.6558127Z
@greatKitteh -- No habla....Gibberish
bballcrook21 says2015-08-11T16:53:06.0905770Z
Without American investment, China and India's economies are absolutely nothing. The U.S. has the largest defense budget, the best trained army, the largest navy, and the strongest air force. It also has the second largest nuclear arsenal, after Russia, but the U.S. has more allies, so it can store its bombs overseas, like we did in Turkey to fight the USSR. BRICS would be destroyed immediately.
whatshouldIdo says2015-12-14T21:45:29.4765966Z
The US would not be able to solo the whole world Forthelulz .
MANDYTHECUBER says2018-04-03T08:00:52.3520092Z
I think brics will win. Reasons: 1)they control 22% of the world's gdp. 2)44% of world's population is in brics. (and it is growing fast because of india and china) 3)brics have more nuclear weapons than nato.

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.