have the RIGHT to? Yes. Youre not OBLIGATED to kill them, but it should certainly be an option
If there was a right, this would ultimately deter individuals from breaking into people's homes
Absolutely so. Self defense and defense of property are essential.
These days theres no time to wait to see someones intentions
Best to just bend over and pretend nothings happening...
If someone enters your house without your permission, they most likely serve as a threat to you and/or your love ones. Killing another person in self-defense is always justified, and sometimes simply inevitable.
I believe you should have the right to kill this person. ONLY if they threaten you or your family as in " i am going to kill you blah blah blah"
Yes, but only if you are in danger of great bodily harm or death.
I wouldn't say kill him or them,but just break about every bone in their bodies,you could kill one just to show the others you're not messing around.
I'd go for incapacitate, unless it was self-defense and he actually tried to kill me.
No one should have the right. Ever. However, in cases one should be able to plea for special circumstances afterwards.
Not unless he's carrying a weapon, but I'd be likely too either way.
Only if they attack me or are brandish a weapon. Breaking and entering itself is not justification to use lethal force--further proof of the imminence of the threat is required.
Only if they attempt to kill you. You should use equal or lesser force.