Yes. Terror breeds terror.
No. America is the one that kills terrorists.
First of all, lets go back to the Cold War. Imagine that there was a country called Country X. Now Country X was a thriving place where everyone lived happily. Now imagine a Country Y coming to Country X and claim that country for themselves. This restricted Country X's movement. So a Country Z funded weapons to the people of Country X and Country X drove Country Y away. Later on, Country Z attacked Country X and started claiming that land and started calling the people who drove Country Y away terrorists. However, Country Z was the one spreading terror through Country X. THEY were the terrorists. Country X was only fighting for their freedom. What do you know? Country X= Afghanistan Country Y= Russia Country Z= America Freedom fighter of X= Taliban The Taliban were the freedom fighters. America were the terrorists
USA = the only country in the history of humanity to ACTUALLY use atomic/nuclear weapons to kill INNOCENT people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And even funnier, when you bring up this argument you have people trying to justify this genocidal/massmurder/terrorist activity because 'MERICA did it. But if anyone else does anything they are the bad guy. One standard is good enough buddy.
I believe america breeds terror because of the fact that we create enemies purposefully I believe 9/11 was an inside job nobody does anything to just do it I believe we either hired people to do it or we did it ourselves to wage war for oil all we had to do was create fear.
Maybe if we stop killing innocent civilians and bombing the fuck out of countries that haven't provoked us in our "regime change" wars, there won't be terrorists after all. We cause many of these issues.
Yes, very much so. Extremely high levels of aggression, coupled with an equally high horse of hypocritical moralism, born from incredible ignorance. Makes for one of the worse empires in history
Lol we've been fighting terrorism. Wot in tarnation?
The united states, in a way, is the Peacekeeper of the world. They essentially fund many other countries counter-terrorism and militaries, and even then they don't rival the US's. We also happen to be a MAJOR contributor to the United Nations, which, without, World War III would have already happened. Although the US, time and time again has hired terrorists to kill the same terrorists they hired to kill the same ... etc. Most of the time, this was because the original state was corrupt, and had ambitions of conquest. Without the US, and it's bases, as well as supporters (including insurgents), Other countries would hold this influence, would you really want that?