Question for pro-life.Posted by: TBR
Imagine you are a firefighter. You come on the seen of a burning clinic. On one side of the building is a lab with many viable embryos. The other, a small child. You can only save one. What is your choice and why?
Embryos. Parents out there could have had them saved, they might be infertile, theres alot of lost hope there. Also there is a greater chance to save more there since they are likely sealed and arent going to die of asphyxiation during the rescue. He can carry a great many more of them ... in effect helping more parents/people than the one child could account for. They cant make noise though or call out for rescue ... so im sure we wont see him running that way. In the heat of the moment he's not going to have time to think about what the most logical thing to do is either, unfortunately. I suppose you could compare that same desperation and ill-logic to people getting abortions as well though.
A bunch of people versus one. Easy decision.
What Freedombeforeequality said.
TBR just rekt u all
Pro-lifers got rekt m8
The child is capable of feeling much more pain, so by the principle of benevolence they should come first.
Whether it's right or not, I'd grab the baby and not think twice.
The baby was already born
A baby is a living, breathing person and embryo's are just cells. I'd rather not hear the screams of a burning child either. Cells don't feel the pain that the child will, and if I left that baby behind it would traumatize me, unlike with the embryos.
both would suck to have burned but the embyros couldn t feel pain and a baby could but that doesnt mean that embryos arent living babies