• Good

  • Bad

80% 4 votes
20% 1 votes
Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Bennett91 says2014-07-26T02:30:52.7887631-05:00
It depends how you define "Good and Bad". Given his minor role in the events following his demise, I'd say his existence was negligent. Rasputin (1869-1916 (47) was alive during the beginning of WWI. It can be said who ever caused WWI subsequently caused the horrors of WWII. Rasputin "begged the Tsar to do everything in his power to avoid war." and said about WWI "If Russia goes to war, it will be the end of the monarchy, of the Romanovs and of Russian institutions." [1] Rasputin tried to avoid the inevitable; foolish, but not "bad". [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigori_Rasputin#World_War_I
Owl099 says2014-07-26T20:46:10.2299148-05:00
Well I think that he wanted to stop the suffering in the first world war. "The Tzar's reign" excuse was probably just to get the Tzar out because he did not care very much for the people who died. And Mahatma Gandhi wanted India to fight in WWI and WWII and he was a man of non violence (although he did feel it was not the right thing (WWI) ).

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.