The vaccines are tools created by the satanist illuminati. 0bama is secretly Hillary Clinton in disguise, and he's doing so to run for more terms. That way, he can impliment his plan further into turning the US into a Communist marxist-leninist new world order. He's pushing vaccines so everybody will be too autistic as well as other issues to vote against him. Wake up everyone, vaccines are EVIL.
Which vaccine? I could see a difference between the recommended vaccines that have been around for decades and experimental vaccines that have been around for less than a year. The former gets the most blame, which is especially egregious since the people making the blame are ignorant sheeps who still didn't get over the fact that autism is genetic, and doesn't even mean at all what they think it means.
If we allow parents to choose whether or not to have their children vaccinated, then we are allowing them to choose to put their children on a path free of preventable deadly diseases versus a path filled with preventable deadly diseases. This could also be called allowing parents to care for their children or abuse them. I would suggest that choosing not to vaccinate is one of the few criteria that I would say automatically makes a parent unfit to care for their children. They are buying into propaganda from non professionals and putting their children's lives at risk.
Should not allowing their kids to be vaccinated be considered child neglect? Anything to do with disease isn't mentioned for it, but making sure their child gets proper care should be considered as a requirement.
When I look at the situation with anti-vaccine people, it reminds me of faith healers who let their children die because they think that faith in God will save them. They are refusing to get help for something that is easily preventable, then their children face the consequences of their parents actions. These people shouldn't even have children if this is how they treat them.
When you are a child, its really dangerous for your parents not to give you a vaccine because you haven't fully developed your immune system. Not giving babies vaccine would just put them in more danger, and vaccines aren't even dangerous. Most people around me regularly get vaccinated including me and we haven't died from it, or got autism or whatever people claim vaccines do.
Anti-vaccine people are just trying to spread disease for no reason, so why should we let them? Their children would probably die before they think that vaccines are exactly what they are: a method to prevent diseases.
Many health care professionals, doctors and scientist do not vaccinate their own families due to the risks. Congress created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP); to help victims of adverse vaccine reactions. There is currently more than $3 billion available in a federal trust fund to compensate people hurt by vaccines. More than $2 billion has already been paid out to Americans with vaccine injuries since 1988.
Think about this... If you are afraid of getting a disease vaccinate yourself. IF the vaccine works, you are then supposedly protected. You have nothing to fear from others that choose not to be injected with the following chemicals: MMR vaccine
live measles (Enders' attenuated Edmonston), mumps (Jeryl LynnTM), rubella (Wistar RA 27/3), and varicella (oka/Merck) strains of viruses neomycin monosodium L-glutamate (MSG), potassium chloride, potassium phosphate monobasic, potassium phosphate dibasic, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate dibasic, sorbitol, and sucrose human albumin, HUMAN DIPLOID CELLS FROM ABORTED FETUSES, residual components of MRC-5 cells including DNA and proteins, bovine serum, hydrolized gelatin, and chicken embryo
"Should all school age kids receive vaccinations?" ABSOLUTELY NO! Many of those kids are allergic to the ingredients.
The CDC even recommends that some children NOT be vaccinated.
@INTresting, I don't think you really understand the whole vaccination situation. Herd immunity is a concept that basically involves everyone around someone (such as an elderly person, an infant, a child with an allergy, etc.) that for whatever reason cannot receive the vaccine. In the grand scheme of things, only a very small percentage of children actually cannot receive a vaccination, and so everyone else needs to make sure that they do for the good of those people. The fact that there is funding for anyone that takes a vaccine that shouldn't for compensation only strengthens these facts.
AR12345 You are wrong. I do fully understand the whole vaccination situation".
I am not a fan of FORCED chemical injections of murdered babies, and other toxic chemicals into a human. You however argue that injuring and even killing a few to "save" the herd is worth the loss of life.
Hum. "Most children are allergic to the ingredients" No offence mate, but where did you get that idea from? Vaccin allergy only concerns a very small minority of people in general, let alone children. You don't develop an allergy during your life, nor do you get rid of one. You're born with it, or you're not. And while I do not have official stats at hand, cases of vaccin allergy don't concern more than 2 or 3% of the total population.
Some people are allergic, I don't think that you can say they are bad because they cause autism though, this is ridiculous, for one, autism is genetic, for two, the average autistic person is smarter than the average person. List of autistic people:
I completely believe in vaccinations and I think wholeheartedly that vaccinations are a big reason we have all survived this long BUT I don't know if we all have the right to tell people that they HAVE to inject a substance into their child. Some people (again- not me) have a very strong opinion that vaccinations are harmful and could hurt or disable their child. It's a double edged sword, though, because if you allow parents to make the decisions they think are best for their child or you run the risk of allowing those children to contract diseases we absolutely are able to prevent. It's a tough subject.