Should Conservatives rally against traitors in our own party?

Posted by: Haroush

This is regarding people like Rick Perry, the Governor of Ohio, Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, and others who like to bow down social movements created by liberals.

13 Total Votes

Accept these traitors

7 votes

Boycott them!

6 votes
Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
gabep says2015-07-03T08:32:27.0475782-05:00
reece says2015-07-03T11:31:23.6155146-05:00
@mystery_man43 You're pro slavery too like the good old days? Morality evolves, it's called progress. While the right-wing creates terrorist driven regimens or plays victim cards, us progressives are wanting to make the world equal for the better. You are fighting a losing battle.
mystery_man43 says2015-07-03T11:32:51.5341374-05:00
@reece LOL Where did you get that from? I'm not pro-slavery.
reece says2015-07-03T11:34:13.4045118-05:00
@mystery_man43 You're a lost hope, goodbye.
mystery_man43 says2015-07-03T11:38:03.8228143-05:00
@reece I can't believe you. You start coming up with false accusations against me and leave... SMH.
SithKiller says2015-07-03T13:32:36.5643084-05:00
I'm a conservative, but I support Liberals on gay marriage, why would you hate gays, when you know they do not have a choice, did it every occur to why there gay's in Saudi Arabia? Umm, I really don't think anybody would choose to be gay there.
Stefy says2015-07-03T14:49:32.9002251-05:00
What would this rallying entail exactly.
Varrack says2015-07-03T23:57:54.8185771-05:00
1) this poll is just dumb, 2) why is everyone assuming this is about gay rights?
triangle.128k says2015-07-04T00:00:13.5700062-05:00
@Varrack Because the more extreme conservatives are often homophobic.
Haroush says2015-07-05T21:28:39.7915470-05:00
It's not about hating gays.. It's about protecting family core values. Family core values evolves around the only actual definition of marriage which is between a man and a woman. 2. The procreation of human beings without unnatural forced pregnancies. 3. Giving kids a stable environment to live in without the possibility of corruption of their mind. ( IF you are going to try to give statistics on this I'd like to see someone try to use statistics about the well being of families before the 1970's since this was the time when progressivism really kicked into high gear. ) 4. Giving those who help the well being of the government and community with natural procreation tax breaks to help support their kids become successful in the future. I'll start with this. For a rebuttal, I say social liberal movements are worth fighting and if you are going to expect one side of your party to just let things go then we should separate from you and make our own party. It's not worth being with two faced politicians who don't have no back bones and are more worried about votes than their own core principles. It's pathetic if you ask me. Lastly, it was Puritans who created this nation so have some respect for your religious community whether you like them or not because if our own nation keeps coming against people like us we will rebel against this nation just like the Puritans did against Great Britain.
Haroush says2015-07-05T21:30:39.2427163-05:00
@ Sithkiller, you are more so Libertarian which is to me not a liberal or conservative, but more so an ugly scientific experiment.
triangle.128k says2015-07-05T21:43:14.0809088-05:00
The Puritans were religious zealots, the US was founded to have seperation of church and state.
triangle.128k says2015-07-05T21:45:37.6595559-05:00
1. Guess what? Definitions change, the English language isn't static. You're worried about the definition of one single word. Why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry? It's not like it's effecting you. 2. What unnatural forced pregnancies are you talking about? 3. What corruption are you talking about? Most of the corruption exists in the southeastern states which tend to be very socially conservative.
Haroush says2015-07-06T10:16:15.8316161-05:00
Definitions don't change perceptions do.
triangle.128k says2015-07-06T10:19:27.2440362-05:00
Incorrect, definitions DO change. You're worried over the definition of one word, you're so fearful of change.
Haroush says2015-07-06T10:20:22.7647921-05:00
It was separation of government and state, not church and state. Besides why would the Puritans want separation of church and state? They were mainly looking for fiscal freedoms they weren't looking to have gay civil unions be created or union of the same sex be created.
triangle.128k says2015-07-06T10:23:18.8899211-05:00
Seperation of government and state? That is one of the stupidest things i've heard. The term separation of church and state refers to the state being the government. The church means religion, the founding fathers were strictly for religious freedom and church-state seperation.
triangle.128k says2015-07-06T10:23:49.7469189-05:00
The founding fathers weren't puritans if you didn't realize.
triangle.128k says2015-07-06T10:24:57.7546968-05:00
Who cares what the puritans wanted anyways? It's 2015, gays should have the right to marry. It's not effecting you in any way, you're scared to change the definition of one word.
triangle.128k says2015-07-06T11:15:19.8770639-05:00
I'm sorry that you want to enforce your religious beliefs upon law.
58539672 says2015-07-06T22:46:20.1751757-05:00
Most dictionaries are updated every 10 years. The last time Webster Dictionary (which currently has 15.7 million words in its archives) updated itself, it added 3000 new words and modified close to 15,000. Changing definitions is nothing new. In fact it is rather common.
reece says2015-07-06T23:13:46.2814582-05:00
Language isn't exclusive to evolution.
reece says2015-07-06T23:23:50.0873332-05:00
...From evolution...* i mean.
Haroush says2015-07-08T11:37:33.0418457-05:00
See Triangle, you don't get my point. What I was saying is the separation of church and state is better understood if you were to say separation of government and state. I say this because at the time the Puritans rebelled against Great Britain and their doctrine, they weren't looking for a way out of religion, they were looking for a way to practice their own religion which was under the same title Christianity as the Catholic Church in Great Britain. And to my point, many of these liberal social groups were created by the government themselves to reprogram peoples' minds which is not right. That is called coercion. I could name off the top of my head quite a few liberal social groups created in cities all over the United States to cause massive protests and even riots for the sake social movement agendas.
Haroush says2015-07-08T11:39:56.2001984-05:00
Definitions change in modern English but not in old Latin.
triangle.128k says2015-07-08T11:55:11.2904446-05:00
I don't get what you mean, seperation of government and state doesn't make sense. What does it have to do with seperation of church and state?
triangle.128k says2015-07-08T11:57:28.8677265-05:00
There's nothing wrong with not being a homophobic, science denier like what social conservatism basically is.
triangle.128k says2015-07-08T11:57:40.0061979-05:00
Far-right social conservatism that is.
58539672 says2015-07-08T14:16:51.1906383-05:00
@Haroush Of course latin doesn't change. Its a dead language. Dead things don't change much.
Haroush says2015-07-08T18:02:24.2395722-05:00
@58539672, If Latin is a dead language then why do all root words from English go back to Latin? Haven't you heard that is the way you are supposed to decipher what a word means when you don't have a dictionary? Even the medical and science field still use Latin very much so.
triangle.128k says2015-07-08T18:18:43.1123316-05:00
I feel sorry that you cry over the definition of one word.
Haroush says2015-07-08T18:24:35.3356279-05:00
Somebody is mad cause they can't get the upper hand in a conversation... Pathetic.

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.