This my, friends, is the winner of this thread. "Squirrelnuts57 says 'People can learn butt stuff on their own. Plus homos aren't reproducing, so it doesn't matter what hole they stick "it" in.'. Winner of what exactly, I cant say.
Briantheliberal: Heterosexual privilege? Give me a break, trying to pull a victim card won't work here. Please explain how sex ed being taught in schools is oppressing gay people. The truth is there is no valid reason to have a separate sex ed for hetero/homosexual sex. By your own logic, you should have voted "No". You said so yourself "There is nothing regarding sex that gay people do that heterosexuals do not". So why should there be a distinction. That class would be pointless. The class would go along the lines of: "This is how straight people put on condoms, this is how gay people put on condoms; This is how straight people get erections, this is how gay people get erections; This is how straight people get their period, this is how gay people get their period." It's redundant and pointless to teach homosexual sex ed because, as you said so yourself, there is no distinction between the two. It should just be sex ed.
@TBR, I would probably win execution if anyone who disagrees were here by me meow. I just worded it funny. I'm saying the same thing as @PeterSmith, heterosexual sex ed gives the "gist". Thank you fro crowning me winner though. HAHA!
Canadaray, sex ed isn't about sexuality. It's about trying to prevent kids and teenagers from contracting STD's and getting each other pregnant. No part of the education would apply differently to straight/gay people, so there would be no distinction from what is taught. Therefore, there should not be an entirely different curriculum for homosexual sex ed since there is no difference.