Yes, law abiding citizens should be allowed to own them
No, law abiding citizens should not be allowed to own them
I ask anyone to challenge me on it here or with private messages
really cool to own one!
We don't want to die ... yet
all men have the right to defend themselves from any possible danger
I believe that semi automatics should be allowed, they are easier to maintain and far safer than fully automatic rifles. Oftentimes the M4 is often confused with the AR 15, they have different firing rates. The AR 15 is really a big pistol, while the M4 is a fully automatic rifle.
Yes, because we should not allow the government to own the monopoly on violence in certain situations. When a person uses a hammer to kill some one, that hammer could be called an "assault weapon" The term is engineered to scare the uniformed and sway the ignorant into succumbing to a step by step program of disarming the populace. First they take the "assault weapons" that look scary, then they add to the list of "assault weapons" to include semi-auto pistols and then revolvers are added...See where this is going if left unchecked?
Obviously not. Everyone is abiding by the law until they do something bad. The highschoolers from Columbine were "law-abiding citizens" and so was the man from the Aurora movie theater shooting, but that didn't stop them from getting assault rifles and killing people. My point is that everyone is abiding by the law until they break it, and if they do, it could be too late. So, no, no one should be allowed assault weapons.