Vote
40 Total Votes
No - Voter Comments
History_Soldier says2017-09-18T16:53:15.2166569Z
Report Post
Because if we did we would drag Russia and China into the conlfict as well, which means World War III
AlterEgo says2017-09-20T02:38:20.2945333Z
Report Post
As much as there should be some action taken against North Korea; a nuke is not the answer. There are tons of innocent people in North Korea and the surrounding area that may end up getting hit by it.
imnotstupid says2017-09-21T19:38:14.2267263Z
Report Post
They would nuke us back. At this point, the purpose of nukes is to intimidate, not to actually detonate and use them.
Lewiven49 says2017-09-22T21:20:12.8546763Z
Report Post
This wouldn't solve issues. If anything, it would ruin the US' reputation further by putting their allies (South Korea and Japan) in danger. This could result in the US losing allies, and potentially starting up other conflicts. For example, it might motivate Russia or China to retaliate and attack the US, causing another World War. Not to mention that many innocent (albeit some brainwashed) lives would be lost over practically nothing. It's not worth it, there are ways to solve the conflict, and a nuke isn't one of them.
BrianYang says2017-09-27T05:27:45.8391374Z
Report Post
North Korea isn't just going to let us nuke them. They've got a bunch of stuff pointed at Seoul and I've gotta have my kpop....
Plus there's China and all.
ghostown says2017-09-27T15:26:04.5286783Z
Report Post
as much as i want too nuke them you do realize that this would mean we were declaring war on north korea and would bring china into the war and would start world war 3 right?
Kiwi20 says2017-09-28T14:15:15.2418493Z
Report Post
A nuclear detonation is one of the worst solutions to the problem. There are millions of innocent people who hold no responsibility for their leaders cruel actions, and a nuclear weapon would kill them in the thousands. Nuclear bombs are also very harmful to the earth and ecosystem, and keeping the number of detonations to a minimum would be best. I think NK needs to be dealt with, but in a way that keeps civilian casualties to a minimum. Now if they fire first... That is a different story.
szexiv says2017-09-29T08:45:19.0937909Z
Report Post
nuke the poor white trash
hitler999 says2017-11-13T08:07:09.0866013Z
Report Post
if that happened north Korea would nuke back and then more countries would get involved and then the world would plunge back to the stone age by nuclear war
armoredcat says2017-11-18T19:20:41.0424133Z
Report Post
Leave the authoritarian monsters alone.
Chatsa says2017-12-10T21:57:34.5053965Z
Report Post
That would only make everything worse.
jrinsd69 says2018-02-10T15:54:36.4186076Z
Report Post
No, but putting a tomahawk cruise missile through the dictators bedroom window would be great!
ThePresident2040 says2018-02-17T06:02:32.5077222Z
Report Post
This is just a bad move overall. If the US strikes first, we will have lost the war from the very beginning. Multiple countries have stated that if we move first, they'll blow us out of the water. North Korea is very close to our allies in this war, aka South Korea. The strike would no doubt have a huge effect on South Korean lives as well, and the multitude of innocent civilians living in North Korea.
Zombieguy835 says2018-04-07T19:45:38.7169477Z
Report Post
lets see...... Russia and China, allies to N.K, have nukes! So, nuking N.K would end the world! soooooooooooooooo no!
Yes - Voter Comments
why should we bomb north korea, what did they do to specifically usa
North Korea is a threat to the whole the US, allies, and pretty much everyone. Why let them act first and kill our citizens?!?!
Bomb the wops and chinks
Poor white trash
Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and 