Yes, "assault weapons" should be banned
No, "assault weapons" should NOT be banned
Yes, but POLICE and Military Police should be allowed all types of weapons along with body cameras. I also believe in legalizing with informed knowledge and consent state-sponsored terrorism in one state in the west coast and two or three in the southwest area.
Don't ban guns in general, pistols or hunting rifles should be allowed, but there is no getting around the simple fact that there are no civilian uses for an assault weapon. Full or semi auto, it doesn't matter. Get rid of all of them.
... what is the point of them? Like seriously? "I need to protect my family with this AK47"... that is a bit of an over kill
Yes! Ban any gun that could be used for an assault on a person.
No ban, but a progressively more stringent system of controls.
Never enough dakka.
I assume you mean assault rifles, in any case just restrict them to semi auto and put certain reguations on them.
Then only crooks will have them!
Just because "assault weapons" can kill someone does not mean that they should be banned. People can die from choking on food but does that mean that food should be banned?
if police are the only ones with assault weapons than in war when there busy were vulnerable to attack from enemy country. we need to be ready. America was founded on the citizens having the ability to fight and having weapons. so what are we going to do when were attacked by countries with assault weapons
The entire premise behind this law is a farce. "Assault weapons" are no more than hunting rifles dressed up to look cosmetically similar to assault rifles and machine guns. The ban didn't reduce crime in 1994, it didn't reduce crime in California, and it wouldn't reduce crime a third time around.