Supporting the Albu Nimr

Posted by: FantumHeist

They are a anti isis group who seem promising they say that they will take no prisoners. Should we give them supplies?

Vote
6 Total Votes
1

We should supply them with guns, armor, and if we must.... Men

3 votes
1 comment
2

No we should not they might turn against us

3 votes
1 comment
Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
Nevearo says2014-11-20T07:44:25.4595965-06:00
How about "No, Taking no Prisoners is wrong and against the Geneva Conventions, and we need a group that actually respects international law there, not another fundamentalist group." This is why you should only have "Yes" or "No", and let us provide the reasons why in the comments.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T07:53:41.7810369-06:00
Nevearo ISIS have beheaded many people I believe the Geneva Convention would understand why the Albu Nimr would take no prisoners and I think they would let it slide if ISIS get to big WW3 will begin the Shia have already prepped 30,000 soldiers to fight ISIS
Comrade_Silly_Otter says2014-11-20T09:45:42.0708239-06:00
The groups are are fighting today are the groups we trained and armed years ago. Stop sending guns into the Middle East.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T09:59:33.2633605-06:00
Comrade do you like Russia?
Squirrelnuts57 says2014-11-20T09:59:47.8200265-06:00
I think that neither of these are right. We should look into theses guys. Investigate. Then, if they seem worth the time and money, sure. It beats doing nothing. But, if something seems off, or if they are just looking for power, the deal should be off.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T10:05:50.5793375-06:00
Squirrel some of they're soldiers are in training and some are currently fight along side the Sunni tribal men
Comrade_Silly_Otter says2014-11-20T10:07:51.4518309-06:00
Do I like Russia? Not really, but I like its history in WW2.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T10:16:39.3852830-06:00
Well an American Politian once said we should stop supplying the Russians during ww2 that would have made them lose against the Germans on they're front why should we stop supplying groups like Albu Nimr
Comrade_Silly_Otter says2014-11-20T10:18:39.6994074-06:00
That is different. That is funding a NATION, not a group. A nation has a stable platform, a group does not. Supplying groups in the Middle East has done nothing from create more violence. The Middle East is unstable, and full of religious intolerance.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T10:21:33.4286247-06:00
ITs either we support them and save our troops or don't support them and they die off and we send our troops NO OUR PEOPLE IN TO CLEAN UP THE MESS AND MOST OF THEM WILL DIE AND IF ALL THE ANTI ISIS GROUPS DIE OFF THE ISLAMIC STATE SUCCED AND BAM WW3
Comrade_Silly_Otter says2014-11-20T10:26:43.7862414-06:00
The Islamic state won't achieve victory, at least in the sense of gaining a recognized nation. How would WW3 start if they even achieve such?
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T11:02:32.2457439-06:00
IF the succeed they might invade other places and if its gets to bad other countries might step in if ISIS gains allies they're allies might fight with them and you know what happens next WW3
Comrade_Silly_Otter says2014-11-20T11:33:14.9961927-06:00
Who will ally with the ISIS? They could not take a country like Turkey, Israel, China, Russia, of India.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T12:09:00.3163995-06:00
They are terrorist they can hurt the people and make them fear them and therefor over throw the protectorates/government
Comrade_Silly_Otter says2014-11-20T12:12:33.8858755-06:00
You're sorta paranoid.
FantumHeist says2014-11-20T12:13:34.8366383-06:00
Nope
dbushwacker says2014-11-20T14:13:07.7913555-06:00
I don't think WW3 will be caused by ISIS.

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.