Was Mariuana Prohibition Founded On Racisim And Corporate Corruption?

Posted by: pozessed

15 Total Votes

Marijuana Was First Prohibited For Neither Of These Reasons

12 votes

Marijuana Was Prohibited For Racist Reasons

1 vote

Marijuana Was Prohibited For Corporate Greed

1 vote
1 comment

Marijuana Was Prohibited For Corporate Greed And Racist Reasons

1 vote
1 comment
Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
pozessed says2014-04-16T10:26:50.4457363-05:00
@Jifpop09: That's the first time I heard that conclusion. Can you supply a source?
pozessed says2014-04-16T20:58:48.1390095-05:00
The actual story behind the legislature passed against marijuana is quite surprising. According to Jack Herer, author of The Emperor Wears No Clothes and an expert on the "hemp conspiracy," the acts bringing about the demise of hemp were part of a large conspiracy involving DuPont, Harry J. Anslinger, commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and many other influential industrial leaders such as William Randolph Hearst and Andrew Mellon. Herer notes that the Marijuana Tax Act, which passed in 1937, coincidentally occurred just as the decoricator machine was invented. With this invention, hemp would have been able to take over competing industries almost instantaneously. According to Popular Mechanics, "10,000 acres devoted to hemp will produce as much paper as 40,000 acres of average [forest] pulp land." William Hearst owned enormous timber acreage, land best suited for conventional pulp, so his interest in preventing the growth of hemp can be easily explained. Competition from hemp would have easily driven the Hearst paper-manufacturing company out of business and significantly lowered the value of his land. Herer even suggests popularizing the term "marijuana" was a strategy Hearst used in order to create fear in the American public. "The first step in creating hysteria was to introduce the element of fear of the unknown by using a word that no one had ever heard of before... 'marijuana'" (ibid). DuPont's involvment in the anti-hemp campaign can also be explained with great ease. At this time, DuPont was patenting a new sulfuric acid process for producing wood-pulp paper. "According to the company's own records, wood-pulp products ultimately accounted for more than 80% of all DuPont's railroad car loadings for the next 50 years" (ibid). Indeed it should be noted that "two years before the prohibitive hemp tax in 1937, DuPont developed a new synthetic fiber, nylon, which was an ideal substitute for hemp rope" (Hartsell). The year after the tax was passed DuPont came out with rayon, which would have been unable to compete with the strength of hemp fiber or its economical process of manufacturing. "DuPont's point man was none other than Harry Anslinger...Who was appointed to the FBN by Treasury Secretary Andrew MEllon, who was also chairman of the Mellon Bank, DuPont's chief financial backer. Anslinger's relationship to Mellon wasn't just political, he was also married to Mellon's niece" (Hartsell). It doesn't take much to draw a connection between DuPont, Anslinger, and Mellon, and it's obvious that all of these groups, including Hearst, had strong motivation to prevent the growth of the hemp industry.
pozessed says2014-04-16T21:03:56.9498259-05:00
Most marijuana smokers are Negroes, Hispanics, jazz musicians, and entertainers. Their satanic music is driven by marijuana, and marijuana smoking by white women makes them want to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and others. It is a drug that causes insanity, criminality, and death — the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind. Supposedly in the 1937 congressional testimony of Harry Anslinger. Our governments drug czar at the time. I say supposedly because I have found no evidence to back it up. However I don't think the government would want that comment to be made public this day and age, so I see why it would be erased from the record.
Jifpop09 says2014-04-18T07:30:38.1161371-05:00
So the conspiricy theorists come out of the woodwork. Http://www.Youtube.Com/watch?V=JLYC7ltxOrk
discomfiting says2014-04-18T07:34:08.0111899-05:00
Honestly i don't care was it was deemed wrong or criminalized, it doesn't matter. It needs to be changed so it's legal.
Jifpop09 says2014-04-18T10:21:49.8040064-05:00
^ Agreed and here's my link repost http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLYC7ltxOrk
ChrisF says2014-04-18T12:25:49.7831355-05:00
Hey, sometimes conspiracy theories are true. However, I don't believe that it was banned for racist reasons, only for corporate greed. I mean, what other reason could there really be for banning it, but allowing tobacco, which does so much more harm?

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.