You strong believe that there is no deities, you would be very surprised if there was and you are more than willing to debate a theist, but don't fault them too much for being a theist, you just think they're kinds dumb
@YoreLore, are you saying that it is a logical fallacy for theists to believe in god(s) because there isn't enough contradicting evidence or are you saying that I worded it in a logically fallacious manner? Because I've talked to a lot of theists who admit to only being theists because of what they see as evidence for the existence of a deity is not contradicted enough by empirical evidence. Of course, even if there was enough contradicting evidence a lot of them would still be theists, but that is besides the point.
@Black-Jesus - I read the definition of Agnostic Atheist above as "There isn't enough evidence to prove God doesn't exist, but you can't prove he doesn't exist either". That's what I was meaning. I suppose I believe it's down to the people making extraordinary claims to be the ones to prove it. There's no evidence Zeus doesn't exist etc etc. Perhaps it was the wording.