@Dr_Obvious you don't need faith to believe in science.The best thing in science is a scientific theory, do you believe/assume what you see around you is real? Well guess what, relativity is a theory e.g. gravity.
Microevolution is a misnomer. The correct terminology is adaptation. Adaptation is nothing more than environmental factors forcing the expression of traits that already exists in DNA. No new information is added. No matter how a species adapts, it is still the same species. There is no evidence that new information can be added to DNA. Every change that we see is the result of mutations, where DNA is rearranged or actually lost.
Can the right notes on a piano become a beautiful song? Some "random mutations" are from junk DNA.The end result is through Different combinations (epigenetics) like binary code but much more complicated.New information doesn't get added, only modified via chemical reactions, X-rays and cosmic rays.By this processes creation of new proteins or enzymes get made, etc etc etc
And yet there is not one example of new information being added to DNA. You can shuffle it around. That's all. What I mean by new information, is the addition of something that wasn't there before. Something that actually changes the number of chromosomes. According to the latest scientific research, this is impossible.
Different kinds of life have a different number of chromosomes. Evolutionists claim that all life has a common ancestor. In order for all of the different kinds of life to exist, they must, somehow, add new chromosomes to their DNA. As I mentioned, science shows that this is quite impossible.
I'm not lying. When I say new information, I mean meaningful information that can make beneficial changes. Like lizards sprouting wings. This has never been observed. There is no hard science that says it's even possible. It's all conjecture. Let me ask you this. Humans have nothing in their DNA that would allow them to sprout feathers. We will never have the DNA required to sprout feathers. It doesn't matter how many generations you wait, it will never happen. Nature can rearrange DNA. DNA can also get lost. Mutations do not create new information. They destroy it. They obey the second law of thermodynamics, to which there are no exceptions. Things devolve. They become less ordered. This is a scientific fact that evolutionists ignore.
An argument Creationists often use, is that the complexity of life requires a Creator. Evolutionists counter that it's just an illusion of design. Even a simple cell is beyond our ability to understand. DNA is the most complex thing we, as humans, have ever encountered. It amazes me that anyone, who has an understanding of just how complex life is, can believe that it evolved by accident. Also there is the fact that our universe is uniquely designed to sustain life. If you know anything about physical constants, you know that changing them by just a small fraction will result in a barren universe; devoid of all life. Evidence of a Creator is all around you. You just need to open your eyes and look.
@Dr_Obvious There is no such thing as an "accident", people just use that word for a lack of definition. "Also there is the fact that our universe is uniquely designed to sustain life." What fact? If it is a fact that our universe is uniquely designed to sustain life, it should of been a better design. If there was no life, do you think we would be contemplating this idea in the first place?