Who would win in a fight, Vampires, or Zombies?

Posted by: Evannnn

(The amount of zombies would far outnumber the amount of vampires, in order for it to be more equal.)

  • Zombies

  • Vampires

50% 3 votes
50% 3 votes
  • Basically Zombies and Vampires behave the same: they can't be killed easily. Zombies can be chopped into pieces and then are pretty harmless because dumb. Vampires are more intelligent, if they team up, they do that strategically. And if you chop them into pieces you have to make sure you cut the head off properly or (depending on the fandom and mythology) stab them into the heart. On the other hand do vampires react to lack of feeding. Zombies usually do not. But they are slower. And can't do fancy transformations. So I'd go with the homo sapiens sapiens vampyr just because I think the one WITH a brain has better chance then the group collectively searching for them.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
PetersSmith says2014-08-15T00:39:44.2843978-05:00
Evannnn: So you're automatically saying that vampires would win?
Evannnn says2014-08-15T00:41:56.9025481-05:00
No, I'm saying that in a one on one fight, a vampire would destroy a zombie. Zombies attack in hordes, not by themselves. I wanted to make that clear ;p
Formerland1 says2014-08-15T12:17:19.2694131-05:00
We already know this , it was on deadliest warrior .
Evannnn says2014-08-15T13:08:44.6343459-05:00
Deadliest Warriors is fake as hell lmao... Then again, zombies and vampires are too I guess xD

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.