Vote
24 Total Votes
Even though this type of war would last over a decade, with dozens of millions of deaths on both sides, the United States would win. The United States' military budget is over 5 times larger than China's. The Chinese would be on the defensive for majority of the war, the naval warfare would last less than a year with a US victory; however the land battle would last around a decade, as even though the US has better trained troops and technology, the Chinese out number them 4 to 1, and remember the Nazi's fighting the Soviets during WW2, quantity on itself can be quality. This would be a fantastic war the witness, but not experience.
Dozens of millions is not even realistically possible, unless citizens were used as cannon fodder.
It's unrealistic to say their would be +10,000,000 deaths before one side retreated even if the reason for war is great.
And china does have a higher population, but does that mean you expect to send granny into the battlefield... No countries only send trained, well equipped soldiers in their prime (atleast super-powers). And america has a better force in quality and quantity.
No ones disagreeing with you but Haroush.
Note: countries also use drones but still America has better drones.....
Hail to the Modern Whig Party
Can anyone even make an argument for China? Considering are personnel is supplied with 100's of billions of dollars in equipment, intelligence, and tech.
Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and 