• Hillary Rodham Clinton

  • Donald Trump

34% 11 votes
66% 21 votes
  • I don't support her because if she gets elected she could all of a sudden decide to change her policies. However, I'd choose her any day over Trump: he's racist, seemingly islamophobic and a misogynist.

    Posted by: SegBeg
  • Trump is a dangerous idiot.

    Posted by: maslow
  • Not a huge fan of Hillary but Trump a populist hack. Business record sucks, immigration polices make no sense, no clear foreign policy, government is not a business. oh yea and he's a racist bigot.

Leave a comment...
(Maximum 900 words)
UtherPenguin says2016-06-01T22:12:52.2562526Z
Dajjal Trump or Shillary Clinton?
BrendanD19 says2016-06-01T23:06:18.2023296Z
Jill Stein
turntechloser2 says2016-06-01T23:30:07.6887451Z
Neither.
maslow says2016-06-02T21:47:19.5842045Z
@NewLifeChristain: Quite a proclamation from a pronounced "christian"
NewLifeChristian says2016-06-02T23:01:25.0511009Z
@maslow Give me a break . . . You called Trump an idiot. Is that being a real Christian? At least I was actually telling the truth about Killary (spelling intended).
ChaosLupus says2016-06-02T23:53:15.6330404Z
@ Maslow Trump is the farthest thing from an idiot. I'm certainly not a Trump supporter, but even I have to admit his genius in making it this far in the race.
maslow says2016-07-29T23:13:45.8288021Z
NLC and ChaosLupus wow a contest for the dumbest comments and opinions? A long time ago, I suggested a new logical fallacy, a reverse, if you will, on the argumentum ad populum fallacy, in which ideas are rejected solely because they are unpopular. I’ve seen many people arguing this recently and I thought I ought to expand and expound on my ideas. Therefore, I present the “stupid people are stupid” fallacy for your approval. Ultimately, the heart of this fallacy, and it applies specifically to human behavior, is that the individual will reject any idea as inherently unworkable in any social situation because “stupid people are stupid”, or, that people make foolish decisions and therefore, holding anyone accountable to any standard which they might not choose themselves, is useless. Thus you two are certainly USELESS>
ChaosLupus says2016-07-30T04:23:53.6206061Z
@ maslow Ad hominem is a sign of a weak argument. Now, if you'd actually like to discuss Trump's intelligence, let's do so. I certainly don't have an issue with people ripping on Trump, but at least ground it in reality.
NewLifeChristian says2016-07-31T21:43:29.1095609Z
@maslow Wow, it took you a long time to respond.
SegBeg says2017-08-08T10:09:56.7484997Z
I'm gonna barf from what I said in this poll. I can't believe I used to think like that!

Freebase Icon   Portions of this page are reproduced from or are modifications based on work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.