qopel
qopel's Forum Posts

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 4:51:09 PM, wiploc wrote:
At 4/25/2013 4:20:47 PM, qopel wrote:
stubs, Ragnar, Misterscruffles, 1Devilsadvocate, 1Historygenius, adontimasu, Albert, AlwaysMoreThanYou, Anaxa, Apeiron, badbob, BennyW, BigSky, BillyTheKids, CharlieWBC, Chicken, ConservativePolitico, Consummator, DakotaKrafick, DoubtingDave, Dylip, Illegalcombatant, imabench, ishallannoyyo, IwinYoulose333, joseph.bazemore, just4trollz, KeytarHero, kingsjester, Korashk, KRFournier, lannan13, likespeace, lit.wakefield, Logic_on_rails, makhdoom5, MrVan, Nur-Ab-Sal, philochristos, po.osullivan, popculturepooka, ProfessorCNut, Ragnar, robertqiu, rross, samurai, SANTORUM2012, sbaik610, Smithereens, thett3, Typhlochactas, wiploc, x2MuzioPlayer, YYW, Zaradi, zezima

and the rest of you vote bombers can screw yourselves.

Why would you call me a votebomber?

Until you started calling me names and sending harassing private message, I voted only three points for persuasion. After that, I added only the one point for conduct.

You know I'm not prejudiced against you, because I am often the only one on your side, or one of a very few.

In this particular case, you picked the topic, assumed the burden of proof, stated the resolution, made a rule against introducing late arguments, and then forgot to argue in favor of your resolution until the final round. Even if you inexplicably don't agree with my vote, I don't see any way that you can think it wasn't a fair and conscientious vote.

I was winning that debate by over 30 votes. There' sno way in hell I could have lost it without vote bombs. Fuk You.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 4:37:28 PM, Thaddeus wrote:
This guy is sad. Special thank you to Imabench and Subutai for CVB. If he's going after more members I can help out.

It's going to take you a year to try to cvb me.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

stubs, Ragnar, Misterscruffles, 1Devilsadvocate, 1Historygenius, adontimasu, Albert, AlwaysMoreThanYou, Anaxa, Apeiron, badbob, BennyW, BigSky, BillyTheKids, CharlieWBC, Chicken, ConservativePolitico, Consummator, DakotaKrafick, DoubtingDave, Dylip, Illegalcombatant, imabench, ishallannoyyo, IwinYoulose333, joseph.bazemore, just4trollz, KeytarHero, kingsjester, Korashk, KRFournier, lannan13, likespeace, lit.wakefield, Logic_on_rails, makhdoom5, MrVan, Nur-Ab-Sal, philochristos, po.osullivan, popculturepooka, ProfessorCNut, Ragnar, robertqiu, rross, samurai, SANTORUM2012, sbaik610, Smithereens, thett3, Typhlochactas, wiploc, x2MuzioPlayer, YYW, Zaradi, zezima

and the rest of you vote bombers can screw yourselves.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 4:08:34 PM, imabench wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

^ need someone to counter qopel since hes going around being a retard

I'm just getting started.

I tried to do things the right way.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 11:55:28 AM, Pennington wrote:


Do not vote an any of my debates. I don't need your biased votes.

Same-so. Agreed.

Well? I still see your votes. Take them down.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 11:50:05 AM, Pennington wrote:
At 4/25/2013 11:27:35 AM, qopel wrote:
At 4/25/2013 11:24:05 AM, Pennington wrote:


"I give sources to Con because he was the only one to use any."
Liar, cheater, vote bomber.

I missed your one source and it still does not our weigh Cons.

Do not vote an any of my debates. I don't need your biased votes.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 11:11:51 AM, wiploc wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

Tied, with very little time left (just two hour, as I post this).

This thread isn't for reporting ties. Now I'm losing because of your BS appeal for vote bombs.
CHEATER
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 11:24:05 AM, Pennington wrote:


"I give sources to Con because he was the only one to use any."
Liar, cheater, vote bomber.

I missed your one source and it still does not our weigh Cons.

Try to talk your way out of it. You're just a vote bomber and vote based on the fact that you don't like me. They should name this website "Vote of the Flies".
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 11:17:57 AM, Pennington wrote:
http://www.debate.org...

Had a recent VB with no RFD here and I offer my thoughts.

My perception by votes:
Medic- 3 for Con and acceptable RFD
Enji- 3 for Pro and acceptable RFD
Magic800- 4 for Pro and a iffy RFD but accepted
Anna- 3 for Con and acceptable RFD
Guesswhat- 3 for Con and bad RFD
Ragnar- 3 for Con and good RFD
Sola- 3 for Con and bad RFD
Tmar- 6 for Pro and close to a VB even with smith
16k- 3 for Con 1 for Pro and good RFD
Medv- 4 for Pro and bad RFD
Misterscriffles- 4 for Pro and acceptable RFD
Jack- 3 for Pro and acceptable RFD
NXY99- 3 for Pro and Bad RFD
AMTY- 3 for Con and acceptable RFD
Smith- 6 for Con and good RFD iffy points distribution even with Tmar
Aperion- 3 for Con and good RFD
Jon- 5 for Pro and iffy RFD but accepted
TNO5- 3 for Con and acceptable RFD
Kicker- 5 for Pro and 2 for Con and bad RFD

Points
Pro has a 4 point advantage that he should not.

Cry me a river. Look at all the debates I lost that way.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Post Unvoted, Forfeited & Vote Bombed DebatesPosted 8 years Ago

At 4/25/2013 11:15:35 AM, Pennington wrote:
At 4/25/2013 11:01:47 AM, qopel wrote:
At 4/25/2013 10:38:52 AM, Ragnar wrote:
At 4/25/2013 9:01:51 AM, qopel wrote:
VOTE BOMB

http://www.debate.org...

Pennington's RFV was a complete lie.

Since it's not 7 points and has a detailed RFD, it's clearly not a votebomb... Perhaps a biased vote? I say challenge them to a debate to defend it or another issue.

Call it what you want...a vote grenade if you will. People here are doing all sort of tricks to get away with vote bombing. They vote 6 instead of 7, they claim cvb on a legitimate vote, They come up with BS RFVs that don't mean anything.

I'm sick of it.

Look you haven't been here long and maybe it your debating techniques or lack thereof. I gave you a fair vote. You never addressed Cons argument properly and misrepresented his position.

"I give sources to Con because he was the only one to use any."
Liar, cheater, vote bomber.
Forums Home > Debate.org

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.